Category talk:Trees

...Does this really warrant a category page? Too few articles to be useful.— A ^{(t • c)} 18:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)

I'd rather keep it even if it's just a few pages, since trees are mentioned a lot generally in articles but there's no place where they're all listed.TeoSS69 (talk) 09:20, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

Doesn't really mean it needs it's own category page. — A ^{(t • c)} 17:27, May 3, 2014 (UTC) 

How else would you list them then? TeoSS69 (talk) 19:20, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

I would just keep them as they are. So far  they aren't big or special enough to need to be organized. If someone wants to find where all the trees are listed, they can use plants. — A ^{(t • c)} 19:42, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

Might as well remove insects and minable objects then since being what a tool is useful for isn't special enough. TeoSS69 (talk) 21:32, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

Insects has already been considered for deletion. Mineable objects is actually worth keeping because it desribes something worth categorizing. — A ^{(t • c)} 22:42, May 3, 2014 (UTC).

What do minable objects have more? They're basically the same thing. TeoSS69 (talk) 07:29, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

Mineable Objects arguably have something worth listing. — A ^{(t • c)}